Albert Einstein, " With respect to the RH we note that the Müntz's formula can not be applied to prove the RH based on the Polya criterion. This is due to the divergence of the Müntz formala in the critical stripe and the regularity and asymptotic assumptions to the baseline function. A distributional Hilbert space provides a framework to address the underlying mathematical issue. In same distributional Hilbert space frame the Bagchi reformulation of the Nyman-Beurling RH criterion enables the Hilbert-Polya conjecture. In this context we note that the Zeta function is an integral function of order 1 and an element of the distributional Hilbert space H(-1). With respect to the NSE and the YME the proposed mathematical concepts and tools are especially correlated to the names of Plemelj, Stieltjes and Calderón. The essential estimate for the critical non-linear term of the non-linear, non-stationary 3-D NSE has been provided by Sobolevskii. With respect to the YME the proposed mathematical concepts and tools are especially correlated to the names of Schrödinger and Weyl (e.g. in the context of "half-odd integers quantum numbers for the Bose statistics" and "a truly infinitesimal geometry"). It enables an alternative (quantum) ground state energy model embedded in the proposed distributional Hilbert scale frame of this homepage covering all variational physical-mathematical PDE and Pseudo differential equations (e.g. also the Maxwell equations). The Dirac theory with its underlying concept of a "Dirac function" is omitted and replaced by a distributional Hilbert space (domain) concept. This alternative concept avoids space dimension depending regularity assumptions for (quantum) physical variational model (wave package) states and solutions (defined e.g. by energy or operator minimization problems) and physical problem specific "force" types. In the following document we provide a high level walkthrough to those topics (latest update: April 24, 2018, change to April 23 version: p. 4)):
| ||||||||||||||||