 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
www.unified-field-theory.de
www.navier-stokes-equations.com
An unified quanta energy field theory
A Krein spaces based unified mathematical quanta energy field theory is provided. From the Mie theory the concept of discrete energy knots (accompanied by a correspondingly defined kinetic energy Hilbert space) is taken providing an appropriate modelling framework for a physical problem specific (self-adjoint) kinetic energy operator. From the correspondingly defined extended Krein space framework the concept of a (self-adjoint) potential energy operator is applied. It enables the definition of a related potential energy norm on all of the Krein space.
The Krein spaces based quanta energy (norm) models provide five kinetic energy quanta elements (neutron, electron, positron, electroton, magneton) composed by two mathematical potential energy quanta elements (electrino, positrino). They enable the definition of case specific (classical continuum mechanics, plasma physics, solid state physics, galactic dynamics, theory of granular structure, nucleus + electronic cloud, QED, (DeP) p. 551) hermitian potential energy operators accompanied by corresponding case specific physical constants, (UnA2). There is an additional mathematical potential energy quantum (neutrino) composed by an electrino and a positrino enabling a potential difference model between a vacuum potential (neutrino) and a "plasma matter" potential energy element (neutron). The latter ones are supposed to replace the SMEP quanta w/o "rest masses" (e.g. quarks, photon), the quantum of the solid state physics (phonon), and the quantum of the cosmology (black hole, Newton/Coulomb point mass potentials).
The two quanta without "rest masses" (or better the "purely" potential energy field elements, the electrino and the positrino), may be interpreted as binary quanta information carriers enabling a link to information and consciousness theory.
From a philosophical perspective the two mathematical potential energy field elements may be interpreted as monades:
(WeH2) p. 51: „The classical philosopher of a dynamic world presentation is Leibniz. … For him the real of movement does not lie in a pure change of the location, but in a moving force „La substance est un etre capable d’action – une force primitive – overspatial, immaterial. … The last element is the dynamic point, from which the force erupts as an otherworldly power, an indecomposable strechless unit: the monade“.
(KnA) p. 55: „And so we can conclusively state the relationship of the least action principle to Kant’s Critique of Judgement in the following form: the principle of least action in its most modern generalization is a maxim of the reflective judgement.“
For Leibniz natural processes can be derived from integral principles by the method of the maximum or minimum, (KnA). Mathematically speaking, this means that the action of (otherworldly) monads as observed in natural processes are least action (approximating "forces") solutions in the physical side world.
 Braun, K., An Unified Quanta Energy Field Theory |
Braun, K., The current physical and mathematical realities with regards to an unified field Theory |
Braun K., UFT related list of papers |
The mathematical-dynamical and the statistical physical-kinematical "realities"
The proposed model of two perpendicular (kinetic and potential energy) worlds is about a purely mathematical dynamical world (electrinos & positrinos, quanta information) and a physical-mathematical kinematical world (physical space, physical time, physical mass / matter, physical forces), including a biological-physical world (atoms & molecules, viruses & cells, biological information, Schrödinger’s concept of biologically relevant repeated differentials (*), Husserl's concept of internal time-consciousness, (HuE)).
The „two-realities“ model fits to M. Planck‘s distinction between physical-statistical type of laws and „dynamical“ laws, (PlM), and to E. Schrödinger’s two principles, „order from order“ and „order from disorder“ differentiating between the two related underlying mechanisms of biological and physical laws governing regular courses of events, (ScE).
The „two-realities“ model also supports A. Unzicker’s vision „to form a consistent picture of (a mathematical) reality by observing nature from cosmos to elementary particles“, (UnA), (UnA1), (UnA2).
Home | Alexander Unzicker (alexander-unzicker.de)
Wigner E. P., The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural science |
Wigner E. P., Symmetries and reflections |
The current paradigm/narrative of physical systems
- "the behavior of a physical system depends on a scale (of energies, distances, momenta, etc.) at which the behavior is studied. Very generally speaking, the method of renormalization group is a method designed how to describe how the dynamics of some system changes when we change the scale (distance, energies) at which we probe it,. … Physics is scale dependent (requiring only a mathematical metric space framework, which has no geometric structure at all), and at each scale, we have different degrees of freedom and different dynamics, i.e. physics at a large scale decouples from the physics at a smaller scale. ...
… In classical mechanics there are three scales of distance, time, and mass. In non-relativistic quantum theory there are two scales: the mass can be expressed through «time» and «distance» using the Planck constant) and classical relativity («time» can be expressed via «distance» using the speed of light). In relativistic quantum theory there is only the scale of distance (or equivalently – the scale of (its inverse) momenta), (DeP) p. 551.
In summary: In the current narrative the physics is scale dependent and decoupling. The down (complexity) causality thinking results into a degrease of the number of scales, while the number of «Nature» constants increases. The effect of the required auxiliary scales, cutoffs, etc. on the physics is encoded into the renormalization group equation. The "case" if there is no related (G-invariant) renormalization realisation (example ground state energy) is called "symmetry break down", (DeP1) p. 1119 ff.. THe first quantization was about Einstein's discrete energy parcels, the photons, the second quantization was about Dirac's electron spin 1/2 model, where the fine structure constant becomes an error term with regards to the Lamb shift phenomenon, which is not in line with the Dirac model
The new paradigm/narrative
The case specific (classical continuum mechanics, plasma physics, solid state physics, galactic dynamics, theory of granular structure, nucleus + electronic cloud, QED) dynamics are accompanied by phenomenologically visible "forces" resp. "force pressures" (e.g. NSE pressure, Maxwell-Mie electric pressure), the Lamb shift, which originates from quantum effects of the electromagnetic field, or gravitational/cosmic "energy potential differences" and "background radiations". The related mathematical-physical models are variational approximation solutions of an underlying mathematical solution of a Krein space (energy inner product based) variational problem.
The current role of physical constants (e.g. enabling mathematical "renormalization groups" in quantum field theory) changes to a "physical borderline role" governing the different physically relevant potential differences of the considered physical case area, (UnA2).
An only metric space (usually a Riemannian manifold) framework (in line with a scale dependent and decoupling physics) without any geometric structure concept is enhanced by a Hilbert space framework, where a simple metric with scale becomes a norm, which is induced by an (energy) Hilbert space inner product defined by two Hermitian kinetic and potential energy operators.
(*) (ScE1), Mind & Matter, p. 96: „only modifications or differentials intrude into the conscious sphere that distinguish the new incidence from previous ones and thereby unsually call for „new considerations“. … . A single experiment that is never to repeat itself is biologically irrelevant. … . Whenever the situation exhibits a relevant differential this differential and our response to it intrude into consciousness.“
Schroedinger E., What is life and Mind and Matter |
www.goernitz.de - Home
The link to the Riemann Hypothesis
The link of the proposed plasma quanta potential model to the Riemann Hypothesis is when "Number Theory Meets Quantum Mechanics", (DeJ). Or more specifically, this is when number theory meets plasma quantum dynamics providing an appropriate mathematical model for the (physical) Montgomery-Odlyzko law.
Braun K., The Montgomery-Odlyzko law, eigenvalue spacing in a collection of Gaussian unitary operators |
(DeJ) Derbyshire J., Number theory meets quantum mechanics |
