In a nutshell The proposed Unified Field Theory (UFT) is a
comprehensive theoretical framework that aims to unify physical models across
diverse physical domains, thereby eliminating the decoupling and disparate
scaling that characterizes current models based on their respective levels of
granularity. There is a newly proposed (non-mechanical) dynamic energy type; it
complements the current mechanical energy type in such a way that it supports
Planck’s conception of „dynamical type of laws“, (PlM), in alignment with
Bohm’s conception of „wholeness and implicate and explicate order in physical
laws“, (BoD1). It enables complementary dynamic and statistical types of physical laws, where
the least action principle applies only for mechanical laws.
The overall Hamiltonian (total energy) operator of the appropriately defined (mechanical & dynamical energy) Hilbert space systems becomes the sum of two Hamiltionian operators, the
mechanical self-adjoint (Hamiltonian) operator and a (new) dynamic self-adjoint
(Hamiltonian) operator. It enables complementary „matter“ mechanics and
„matter“ dynamics accompanied by corresponding finite norms/functionals resp.
related invariances. This concept makes the spin(0, 1/2, 1) concept in quantum mechanics and the related concept of Abelian- and Non-Abelian
gauge theories in quantum field theories obsolete.
From a product placement perspective a marketing
manager would put the spot on the concept of fusion energy in the
context of the integrated a priori purely dynamics perfect plasma/electromagnetic
systems and the newly proposed mechanical x dynamic atomic Dirac
2.0 systems. The latter ones may be suitable providing three atomic nucleus building blocks for
semi-conductor, conductor, and isolator
atoms.
An unified field theory enabling a deductive structure of physics
December 2022
Eastern 2026 update in preparation Planned release
period: Week 22 A philosophical consideration
According to Kant's „Theory of Natural Science“ in order to
establish a meta-physical foundations of physics it requires an a priori
conception of matter, i.e., its „form“, its necessary and universal
determinations and laws that govern (predictively describe) its behavior, (PlP)
p. 29. "The merely empirical concept of motion "reality" is conceived as objective thinghood (Sachheit). Here
one speaks of „motion as an accient (Akzidens) of matter“, thus not a mere act (Actus) of the productive imagination, i.e.,
motion as description, the describing of a space (moreover, where time, specifically as quantity, is not taken into
consideration at all)", (PlP) p. 297.